I think this shot is offensive, and hypocritical of her, who does she think she is preaching the word of God on national television and then turning around and showing her body to anyone and everyone. London took a step down in in my books, she sucks now.
^Well, the photo was taken before the show, so maybe she didn't believe in Jesus yet? Tbh, the photo looks more like it was taken by a friend or someone, and then they sold the photo to Playboy.
Jesus! This is all so ridiculous. This has been obviously been classified as pre-show which means that when this was taken it may not have been intended for Playboy. It may have been all about artistic expression but the moment someone hands it over to Playboy where it isn't even featured but thrown somewhere in the landscape, the picture becomes smut. As for the question as to why Playboy would use a preshow picture, it's probably because there weren't any post-show pics with London's titties. Just because London is/was a street preacher doesn't mean that she has a conventional relationship with the Lord. Today hundreds of millions of people classify themselves as Christians but everyone has his/her own private relationship. Everyone is shocked sure but it just starts to get very grating to see so many people talk about disappointment or anger over this photo when no one on this board probably even knows her or the situation in actual life. She's a single ANTM contestant with some prevalent issues that any of us would or should know about that may have driven her to do things that many celebrities and normal Americans do. Take nude photos.
I never like London and I never will!This is not artistic nudity,she just looks cheap!Shes not modeling material,in fact,she's horrible for modeling,she needs to stop!Also,I don't think its a big issue to pose for Playboy(French Playboy is actually so classy).The problem is the way the nude shot looks,this shot obviously looks cheap.